Mobile network testing blog

Stories & insights

Mobile network testing

March 6, 2025 | by Arnd Sibila

MNT Tech Insights (part 4): Telefónica O2 - Business Critical Campus Networks, the operator perspective

Presenting part 4 of the MNT Tech Insights which is based on sessions from the Mobile Test Summit, an inhouse event hosted by Rohde & Schwarz in Munich. The summit was attended by the industry professionals from the cellular network ecosystem to exchange and discuss innovative ideas.

Mobile network operators are a significant part of the private networks ecosystem, and I had an interesting discussion with one of the experts, Frank Schmidt-Küntzel from Telefónica O2, who presented on the MTS 2024 regarding business-critical campus networks.

MNT Tech Insights (part 4): Telefónica O2 - Business Critical Campus Networks

Arnd Sibila:
Private networks support many different use cases. To start with a general introductory question: In your opinion, what are the most interesting and promising use cases?

Frank Schmidt-Küntzel:
After the hype of exaggerated expectations based on the reachable, but not nation-wide available maximum characteristics of 5G, there is now a good understanding of the main drivers of private 5G networks, i.e. the guarantee of latency and/or performance for every single connection at all times independently of movement, amongst other reliability aspects coming from the core-coordinated network and the clean reserved frequency. So, the main use cases are those that have a need for a connectivity with constant and reliable high performance.

I think in the long run, one important use case will be the evolution of AGV (Automated guided Vehicles) and AMR (Autonomous Mobile Robots) from being “autonomous” due to missing trust in connectivity to becoming “coordinated”, i.e. that fleets of robots will be sharing information in real-time and able to go much faster and bring additional efficiency and savings.

Moreover, the tasks that cannot be made fully autonomous because of too many unpredictable situations will be a large use case. Many tasks for forklifts, service robots, cranes, vehicles will have more and more automated tasks, but drivers will still remotely connect via 5G to perform more delicate tasks from central locations, thus using rare human expertise only for the tasks where it is needed.

Leading Use Cases for Private 5G Campus Networks

The second large area of use cases that I see is AI. More and more processes will be automated by using access to AI, and it will be much more efficient to connect to a central AI engine with all information than to introduce a huge amount of small decentralized machine-learning intelligence. These rapidly growing AI automation steps will not all be possible or financially viable via cable, so the stepwise AI introduction will be a major driver for reliable real-time wireless connectivity such as Private 5G Campus Networks.

Arnd Sibila:
We know from 5G-ACIA and others about the different network architectures of private networks: Can you tell us, what type of architecture Telefónica O2 already offered to your customers?

Frank Schmidt-Küntzel:
Most customers are still in the middle or even at the beginning of their Digitalization journey – as this is anyway a journey that has hardly a real end. To allow the development of use cases, many prefer to start with an isolated private 5G Campus Network that can be easily controlled and integrated into their IT infrastructure. Therefore, most of our current Campus Networks are isolated private networks (“Campus Network Isolated”).

5G Campus Network Architecture Models - Typical Models for manufacturing sites

But some companies, in the same situation, prefer to start with a less heavy investment and build on existing mobile networks – but reserve and buy a defined private area with private bandwidth and private security within this public network infrastructure. Therefore, we also have running customer networks within our “Campus Network Slicing” portfolio, already using the real 5G Standalone Slicing technology.

The third variant are networks where we have a Campus Network, but we add “roaming” in the public network, so that the connectivity does not end where the private network is ending (“Campus Network Hybrid”).

5G Campus Network Architecture Models - Typical Models for large outdoor and public areas

But obviously, as a large international mobile operator, we can offer all architectural models, and we are already seeing additional models raising interest of the customers for the medium term.

Arnd Sibila:
You mentioned the Campus Network Hybrid. A follow-up question: Why do you see the hybrid network (public and private) as the long-term evolution for private campus networks?

Frank Schmidt-Küntzel:
In the long run, and with mobile frequencies growing higher into the Gigahertz area, the challenge of reliable industrial wireless connectivity is joint by the challenge of bringing high bandwidth classical mobile connectivity into the buildings.
Therefore, companies that need a highly reliable and low latency network and opt for a private 5G network will not want to invest in two separate mobile network systems for their indoor facilities. They want to use their private network infrastructure also for bringing mobile coverage into their factories and logistics halls. They opt for hybrid networks that offer a private dedicated core network, but their radio antennas are connected to two core networks, the private one and the public mobile network, hence offering both a purely local private network and public coverage with the same radio system. On the other hand, companies starting with a Campus Network based on slicing may reach a point where their digitalization applications need a level of latency or reliability that can only be reached with a dedicated core.

Both company categories end up with a hybrid network, regardless of their respective starting point. And many companies select mobile operators instead of integrators as partners for private networks exactly for that reason, to have the option to move to a hybrid network later.

Arnd Sibila:
Can you maybe disclose selected Campus Network Projects that Telefónica O2 supported for customers that you think are most important and insightful?

Frank Schmidt-Küntzel:
It is widely known in the market that we started our journey with several private networks in the automotive industry, for test tracks and production halls, as early as 2017 for 4G and 2019 for 5G.

In recent years I would like to select three examples: We have implemented a private network for the Prinzhorn Hamburger Group in their main location in Austria to help them solve a major challenge, getting reliable connectivity to the last corner of their extremely challenging paper factory with tons of steel, tunnels and outdoor areas. This is currently enabling Prinzhorn, next to finally having security-relevant reachability for their workers and equipment, to develop more and more digitalization projects based on automation, digital twinning and simply the availability of data everywhere in the factory. By the way, this was one of the worldwide first international cooperations of mobile operators to allow a company to offer private networks crossing country borders.

Another example is a company doing crash tests where the measurement equipment was connected via cable, and 5G connectivity offers the obvious advantage to have all measurement equipment always connected within the area of the private network, gaining time and also cost, considering the cost of such cables.

The last example is more strategic, as a health investigation institute, the 6G Health Institute, has bought a “Campus Network Slicing” to perform their research on remote health and on connected patients. The Slicing technology allows the institute to easily add additional locations to the secure private research environment, and the private capacity ensures that important applications can rely on the performance of the network.

Arnd Sibila:
What are the top critical factors for ensuring seamless acceptance of private 5G networks, and from your expert perspective, what proactive measures can be taken to guarantee consistently reliable performance of the campus network?

Frank Schmidt-Küntzel:
Most companies opt for a private 5G network when the failure of connectivity, or its lack of performance stability has important economic or technical, or even safety consequences. The 5G technology is built for exactly these aspects, taking advantage of its real-time resource scheduler and the coordination through its core structure that will keep the benefits over WiFi for at least several standard generations, and possibly even forever due to WiFi backwards compatibility obligations.

What is important now is to match the operations processes with the performance potential of 5G, at least from the moment when the maximum performance is really needed. Redundancy obviously plays a major role to ensure short-term reaction, but also performance monitoring and professional operations expertise are key to make the most out of the network. In the area of monitoring for instance, Telefónica has decided to partner with Rohde & Schwarz to use and develop advanced monitoring solutions, allowing immediate identification of degradations and external influences before they become impacting. Our common interest is especially to investigate the performance of single applications, by testing on application level and applying patterns ensuring their performance.

Current and Future Advanced Monitoring Solutions reduce risks for Industry

Apart from offering different architecture models and solutions from different vendors to be able to select the right solution for the customer situation, we at Telefónica are dedicated to also offer different operation models from efficient basic models to the most demanding guarantees for the most demanding customers.

Thank you very much for your time, Frank.

The video of the Telefónica O2 presentation by Frank Schmidt-Küntzel (Business Head Campus Networks, Telefónica Germany) on the Mobile Test Summit 2024 can be seen here in the “Business critical private network” section.
To all our readers, watch this space for interesting discussions coming your way. Stay tuned!

Related stories

UDP-Stream Test: Measuring latency and timely data delivery with uni-directional traffic

Read more

Interactivity Test: ITU-T Recommendation G.1051 (part 8)

Read more

Interactivity test: Dependency of packet latency on data rate (part 7)

Read more

Interactivity test: Packet delay variation and packet loss (part 6)

Read more

Subscribe MNT blog

Sign up for our newsletter

Stay up to date and get stories and insights with our frequent mobile network testing newsletter.

Stories by category

Benchmarking & optimization

More information

Field services & interference hunting

More information

Innovations in mobile network testing

More information

Testing from RF to QoE

More information

Request information

Do you have questions or need additional information? Simply fill out this form and we will get right back to you.

Marketing permission

Your request has been sent successfully. We will contact you shortly.
An error is occurred, please try it again later.